top of page

EHCPs Under Threat: What We’re Really Losing, and How We Can Do Better

  • Writer: Jarone Macklin-Page
    Jarone Macklin-Page
  • Jul 8
  • 4 min read
School hallway with papers flying everywhere; a large puzzle piece labeled EHCP explodes; a person and child stand in awe; chaos ensues.

The government is considering scrapping EHCPs, but the system is already failing many SEND children. Here’s what we’re really losing, what’s broken, and how to build something better that actually works.


🧩 The Promise That Fell Short


Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs) were meant to be the great equaliser, offering children with additional needs a path to meaningful support in school. For many families, they’re the only hope of being heard.


But the reality doesn’t match the promise. And now, with formal government proposals to scrap EHCPs in their current form, replacing them with a standardised 'tailored list of support', we’re left wondering: what are we really losing? And more urgently, what could we build in its place?


Two people face towering stacks of papers labeled "Assessment Delay." A clock looms above, hinting at urgency amidst chaos.

⚠️ EHCPs in Practice: The Truth Behind the Process


On paper, an EHCP should mean a personalised, legally binding package of support. In practice:


  • Families wait an average of 40+ weeks for assessment, well beyond the 20-week legal limit

  • 95% of appeals against EHCP decisions are won by parents, showing how flawed the process is

  • Support is inconsistent, often limited to a teaching assistant “hovering” in class

  • Reviews are missed or delayed, with little accountability or tracking of real progress


Far too often, parents become project managers and advocates, chasing a system that seems designed to wear them down.


People in a hallway observe a futuristic display case with grass inside. Text reads "Standalised Support Options." Anatomical charts on walls.

🧭 What the Government Is Proposing, and Why It’s Not Enough


The SEND and AP Improvement Plan proposes several changes, including:


  • Replacing EHCPs with a nationally standardised "tailored list of support"

  • Introducing national standards to reduce the postcode lottery

  • Expanding teacher training in SEND and improving inclusive practice

  • Streamlining the process through digitised systems and Local Inclusion Plans


These ideas sound promising, but risk falling short in practice. A rigid menu of support may limit personalisation. General SEND training can’t replace specialist input, especially in large, under-resourced classrooms. And streamlining must not come at the cost of real-life impact.


The intent is there, but without deep structural reform, the outcomes may still fail the children who need help most.


A person in a suit stands on a pile of papers labeled "broken system," reaching towards floating bowls with text. Papers and mountains surround them.

🍎 Let’s Be Clear: Teachers Aren’t the Problem


I want to say this loud and clear: this is not the fault of teachers.

The vast majority are doing an extraordinary job in impossible conditions, juggling overcrowded classrooms, limited resources, and rising needs with very little training or support.


We can’t keep pushing the burden onto already over-stretched schools. The system is what’s broken, not the people in it.


A child sits in a classroom cluttered with paper stacks. A large shredder displays "EHCP BUDGET £4.28M." Labels read "REPORTS," "APPEALS," "PANELS."

💸 A Broken System Burning Through Budget


The EHCP system costs billions annually and yet still fails the children it’s meant to help. Much of the funding goes toward:


  • Panels, reports, and assessments

  • Legal disputes and appeals

  • Administrative costs, not frontline support


Despite this investment, outcomes remain poor:


  • Young people with EHCPs are six times more likely to be excluded

  • Only 39% of adults who had an EHCP are in paid employment by age 30, compared to 63% of their peers without SEND (source)

  • A large proportion leave school with low qualifications and low confidence


(And that includes people with dyslexia, ADHD, and other learning difficulties, not just those with learning disabilities, who make up a much smaller portion of the EHCP population.)

If this were any other system, we’d have redesigned it already.


Family of three overlooks a sunset with school, bus, and educational icons. Text reads "Hybrid Learning." Warm, hopeful mood.

🏫 What Could Work Better (And Cost Less)


Rather than scrapping EHCPs without a thoughtful replacement, we need to rebuild around what actually works. Here’s my vision:


✅ 1. Move to a Flexible, Hybrid Learning Model

Some children with additional needs thrive outside the classroom but have no formal options. A hybrid model, combining in-school attendance with home-based, project-led or online learning, could:


  • Reduce pressure on schools

  • Cater to different processing styles

  • Improve attendance and engagement


Flexibility should be seen as a strength, not a concession.


✅ 2. Build Support Plans With Parents, Not Just For Them


Parents know their children best. Instead of isolating families or making them battle the system, schools and local authorities should co-create Support Partnership Plans:


  • Simple, clear documents based on real needs

  • Reviewed every term with input from home

  • A shared roadmap, not a legal battleground


✅ 3. Equip Schools, Don’t Overburden Them


Funding must go directly to the classroom, not admin offices. This means:


  • Universal access to specialist training for every teacher

  • School-wide use of assistive tech (dictation, text-to-speech, visual planners)

  • Smaller intervention groups and more practical, targeted tools


Let’s spend less on paperwork and more on pupils.


✅ 4. Make Early Support the Default


Currently, children often need to “fail” before help kicks in. We should flip that:


  • If a child shows persistent difficulties, support starts immediately

  • No diagnosis or lengthy waitlist required

  • Outcomes are tracked and support is adjusted dynamically


Early help saves money and changes lives.


People hold hands around a plant growing from cracked ground, near scattered documents labeled EHCP. The scene is set at sunset in front of a building labeled "Inclusive," evoking hope and unity.

🌱 There Is a Better Way Forward


We’re at a crossroads. Dismantling EHCPs without a thoughtful replacement is not just short-sighted, it’s dangerous.


But this moment could also be an opportunity.


Imagine a system where:


  • Support is proactive and personal

  • Families are partners, not adversaries

  • Teachers are trusted and equipped

  • And every child, regardless of need, can access an education that works for them

That future is possible. But only if we stop patching a broken process and start reimagining what inclusion really looks like.


Open book with "Belonging, Support, What if we built something better?" papers fly around. Sunlight streams through doors; people in distance.

✍️ Final Thought


If EHCPs disappear tomorrow, many will mourn the idea of what they promised, rather than what they delivered.


Let’s stop pretending the current model is working. It isn’t. But let’s also reject the idea that nothing better is possible.


Because when we put outcomes above admin, and relationships above red tape, we don’t just save money.


We build futures.


💡 Want to support change?


Share this article with your network. Talk to your school. Ask your MP what’s next if EHCPs go. And if you're an employer or educator, start asking better questions about how we support people who think differently.

Let’s build something better, together.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Blog


Comments


bottom of page